SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS
TIP: for more information on accessing Systematic Reviews, consult the Systematic Reviews page on this guide.
SRs are highly structured evidence syntheses focused on narrow questions or perspectives. They aim to provide measurable answers concerning treatment, policy or intervention in clinical, public policy and educational settings.
Systematic reviews are undertaken by a research team, not an individual. The team approach facilitates rapid reviewing and reduces bias.
META-ANALYSES
Are a subset of systematic reviews, a statistical technique for combining the findings from quantitative studies to come up with new statistical conclusions.
- Not all systematic reviews include meta-analysis, but all meta-analyses are found in systematic reviews.
- Systematic Reviews with meta-analysis are statistically more robust than the analysis of a single study, as they look at more subjects, have subject diversity and have more effects and results to consider.
- All included studies must be sufficiently similar for a meta-analysis to be valid.